KEYWORD SEARCH INDEX

Table of Contents. Volumes 11 - 31 (2001-2022)

(Volume No., Issue No., Month & Year - Feature Articles shown in bold
- other articles listed below)

Volumes: 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

Vol 21.12 July 2012:

Dismissal for sexual harassment: Guidance for employers from the Labour Appeal Court

Dismissal for being drunk on duty : The Labour Court on disciplinary warnings, negligence and the dangers of leniency.

Vol 21.11 June 2012:

Amendments to the Labour Relations Act. Part 2

Organisational rights,collective bargaining and the Labour Court
Amendments to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act
Suspension: The views of the Labour Appeal Court

Vol 21.10 May 2012:

Amendents to the Labour Relations Act: Part 1

Dismissal, non-standard employment, strikes and lockouts

Vol 21.9 April 2012:

Who has the authority to sign a collective agreement?

Private arbitration agreements
Specific performance

Vol 21.8 March 2012:

Reviving withdrawn dispute referrals

When is it safe to strike?
Secret profits and fiduciary duties

Vol 21.7 February 2012:

Giving employers notice of strike action: The Courts' views on how and when the duty is discharged

Supervening impossibility of performance in employment contracts

Vol 21.6 January 2012:

Assessing employer decisions to dismiss based on operational requirements:

(A review of the LAC's approach to substantive fairness)

Vol 21.5 December 2011:

Delaying the disciplinary hearing

Eavesdropping on employee's conversations
Gunning for the CCMA

Vol 21.4 November 2011:

Legal representation at disciplinary hearings

The New Guidlines for CCMA Commissioners

Vol 21.3 October 2011:

Double jeopardy: When can an employee be recharged for the same offence?

Unfair discrimination and personal grooming

Vol 21.2 September 2011:

Social networks, privacy and dismissal

The strike and the employer's mistake
Dismissal following a lifestyle audit

Vol 21.1 August 2011:

The Labour Appeal Court's approach to dishonest employees

Breach of trust - who says so?
Formulating disciplinary charges